Saturday, November 21, 2009
Weather
32 / 24 °C
Home
Hot News
Singapore
World
Plus
Television
Arts
Movies
Music
Sports
Business
Succeed
Impact
Enterprise
Property
Invest
Tech
Gaming
Tech Reviews
Health
Traveller
Voices
Hot Topics
I Say
Weekend Voices
He Said
She Said
Maladjusted
Postscript
POV
Red Dot
Global Citizen
Comment
Blogs
Star Gazing
Idol Chatter
For Art's Sake!
Poparazzi
Rated G
Tech Talk
Makan Kaki
Viewfinder
On the Road
The Sporting Arena
Behind The Headlines
Food
Style
Shop
At Home
Car
Silver
Kids
Two Days
T
oday
Gallery
Today Photo
Your Gallery
Your Photo
Archives
Articles Online (90 Days)
PDF Print (30 Days)
Register
My Profile
log in
log out
Home
Voices
Online Only - An inevitable precedent?
talkback
1 - 10 of 11 responses to "
Online Only - An inevitable precedent?
"
Haywood Jablome
Updated 10:34 PM August 21, 2009
I am even more disgusted to know that I graduated from the same learned institution as you Mr Chee. I'm curious to know about the "couple of scholarships" that you hold. How many? A couple means two. I'm sure you hold more than that. Did you stop taking your anti-delusional pills?
Report Abuse
StillWater
Updated 09:01 PM August 21, 2009
Oh get off your high horse, robin chee. You are not exactly a paragon of virtue yourself. "Kettle, this is robin. You are black." Look at yourself before you criticise others.
Report Abuse
Get Over Yourself.
Updated 12:36 PM July 16, 2009
Ooh.. a scary, scary threat indeed! I'll bet A*Star is panicking right now! What if *gasp* Robin's esteemed tuition students don't want to take their money? Maybe other scholarship boards will come bearing big, shiny gifts to entice your students to take their money. Robin, before all the institutions that gave you your scholarships start regretting that decision, I kindly urge you to examine the direction of the chain of supply and demand in this particular situation.
Report Abuse
Razlan
Updated 11:34 AM July 16, 2009
I am astounded that the writer, a holder of several scholarships, holds such narrow view of what defines a scholar, and how scholars should behave. I would imagine someone as learned as him would hold a more worldly view of our society.
Report Abuse
@drsteventucker
Updated 11:09 AM July 16, 2009
A*Star will not miss the students who boycott. It is the students loss, not A*Star's. Imagine not applying to Harvard because you disagree with their student policies. Harvard won't miss you. A*Star is a growing and premier world class Institution/Centre/Program - any student who can get in should enjoy the training, status, education, and opportunities it brings. And the dress code is optional!
Report Abuse
loupgarou
Updated 02:07 PM July 14, 2009
I'm appalled at such puritanism.
Report Abuse
wilson lim
Updated 12:25 PM July 14, 2009
yes, live and let live. :D
Report Abuse
JOPS28
Updated 03:24 PM July 13, 2009
I agreed totally with M.Lukshumaye. Ms Eng has received her punishment. If she has complied with A-star requirements, let it be. Beside, A-star is well known to groom intellect in research field, why discredit them because one of the many. In a way, if Ms Eng has done the act in some parts of Australia or U.S.A, maybe no one will raise even a eyebrow. Since she was seen regretful for that forgetfulness, let's all put the episode behind us and live happy.
Report Abuse
M.Lukshumayeh
Updated 11:39 AM July 13, 2009
Mr. Robin Chee's wish for Ms. Eng Kai Er's A Star scholarship to be brought to end is perhaps with utmost respect myopic.We all are prone to mistakes and the real question is what would be appropriate punishment for the wrong committed. Let's not miss the point that Ms. Eng's case had received extensive pubilicty and she was found guilty upon pleading guilty by a court of law and punished accordingly. To me this is sufficent punishment. Having have her study grant to be terminated and with that ending all prospects of a career with A Star for which she must have worked hard all these years is an over kill.When considering matters such as these it is important to not to punish any individaul with a sledge hammer. Let's not ignore the Yellow Ribbon Theme of giving a seconf chance! I have no doubt that A Star has strict standards and in the way it dealt with Ms. Eng's matyer it has not compromised its strict and exacting standards in any way.
Report Abuse
Allan Tan
Updated 11:39 AM July 13, 2009
Sometimes if a person has enough substance, an organisation would rather benefit from the person instead of destroying him/her, and that stance is not wrong.
Report Abuse
1
2
2 pages
leave a comment
Irrelevant or inappropriate comments might be edited or removed.
Please note that your comments might be used in the print edition of T
ODAY
.
Name
Email Address
Comments
Enter the code on the right
No more than 1,000 characters.
0
character
Not clear? Click to change
Today's PDF Print Edition