'There is no such thing as safe-riding ... '
Cycling on pavements is not only illegal and dangerous, it is hard to regulate
Letter from Raymund Koh Joo Guan
05:55 AM Dec 22, 2009
I AM shocked that cycling on pavements has been legalised in the Tampines estate.
Such an act might also result in giving foreigners the wrong idea that cycling on pavements is legal throughout Singapore.
Cycling on pavements is an illegal act. It is also dangerous for unsuspecting pedestrians. Therefore, how is such a menace going be constantly kept in check?
I'm sure traffic wardens, Town Council traffic marshals or other volunteer wardens cannot be present round-the-clock to carry out enforcement.
I have written countless letters to the Traffic Police (TP) on the cycling menace around Hougang, Lorong Ah Soo and Serangoon estates but they do not seem to be very active in enforcement.
Neither are they deploying their Neighbourhood Police Post officers or traffic wardens to this cause.
I was shocked when I heard from a TP officer who said that - to his observations - the cyclists seen riding around my estate on the pavement were considered to be "safe-riding".
How does the TP define safe riding? What is the benchmark?
If "safe-riding" is allowed on pavements, wouldn't motorcyclists be considered to be riding safe as well when they ride on pavements in a traffic congestion?
There is no such thing as safe riding on pavements.
If there is, then there would exist "safe speeding" on our expressways.