Thursday, February 23, 2012
Weather
32 / 27 °C
TODAY
Singapore
Commentary
Voices
Hot Topics
I Say
World
Science
Business
Impact
SME
Property
Personal Finance
Sports
Photos
Videos
Sunday
Columns
Maladjusted
Postscript
In Real Life
The Fairer Text
NYT - TODAY
T
Entertainment
Television
Movies
Music
Design
Health
Tech & Digital
Travel
Wine & Dine
Cars
Style
Things To Do
Blogs
Star Gazing
For Art's Sake!
Poparazzi
Rated G
Tech Talk
The Sports Editor Says
Sport Today
Behind The Headlines
Videos of the Day
Today Multimedia
Latest:
 
Home
Voices
Is retirement age necessary?
Email
Print
Is retirement age necessary?
by Jason Chiam Chiah Sern
04:46 AM Jan 11, 2012
The Retirement and Re-employment Act took effect on Jan 1.
It is timely to ask: What does the concept of retirement mean today? Is it necessary for someone to "retire" at 62 or 65? Why must pay be cut at age 62 so that a person can be re-employed, if the job is the same as before?
In many industries, older workers tend to be more valuable, and there is no reason why they cannot continue in the same job.
The talk that this hampers prospects for younger workers is no longer valid. It is a matter of redesigning jobs and not whether someone reaches the "give way" age.
The Government is encouraging people to work longer; it is then a contradiction to say that as people work longer, it should be for less pay because they turn 62 or 65.
It is also a contradiction since the Government is worried about workers lacking enough money for retirement as they get older, and given the inflation rates today.
Hence, it is a double whammy that a worker is asked at age 62 or 65 to "retire" or continue working at less pay.
The Government has long refused to have a "welfare state" and I agree sometimes, especially looking at the euro zone crisis, triggered by governments that aim to please voters rather than think strategically for the long term.
In Singapore, many older workers today would like to continue working, whether it is to pass time (which I suspect is the lesser of the two) or in order to get by with a salary. Think of the cleaning "uncles" and "aunties" at foodcourts and hawker centres.
It is also sad when you look at it.
Hence, the concept of retirement may increasingly not be what was envisaged in the past: Taking life at a slower pace, looking after grandchildren or simply enjoying the fruits of your labour.
It is something of an irony to stay active and not be compensated correctly for the amount of work done.
Do I look forward to retirement? I hope I will continue to work for as long as I can. I am not convinced that we should have a mandatory retirement age in place. I believe that a fundamental mindset change is needed in Government and among employers.
The writer is 37 years old.
Find us on Facebook
Other Voices headlines
What values and from whose perspective?
Taxis should come with Certificates of Entitlement to avoid abuse
GST mechanism can work for small firms
Foreign labour here to stay due to earlier decisions
From village to beautiful building in Geylang Serai
A trade solution to eldercare centres?
No reactivation of ez-link cards to prevent unauthorised use
More Singaporean entrepreneurs?
Cheap foreign labour: Who's responsible?
What is a civil servant?
The Budget and what citizens want: Lower costs
Subscribed to mio TV, but channels removed
Any word on a fare revision for poly students?
The Singapore Airshow, at what cost?
What youth want from local television
Today's PDF Print Edition