Crime rate, economy benefit from Indian state’s alcohol ban

BANDOL (India) — Dozens of women brandishing brooms swooped down on a straw house in this village on a recent weekend, sending the owner fleeing through a rice field as they seized buckets of fruit juice being fermented into a cheap liquor.

An hour’s drive away, a group of village women followed the scent of alcohol into a cornfield to find vats of moonshine dug into the ground, which they guarded for several hours until the police arrived.

Like so many disciples of Carry Nation, the temperance advocate who took a hatchet to United States saloons at the turn of the 20th century, village women are taking matters into their own hands, enforcing a prohibition law in Bihar, one of India’s poorest, most agrarian states.

Though per capita income is less than US$600 (S$839) a year, many if not most men used to routinely spend much of their money on alcohol, further impoverishing their families.

“It was the acceptable norm to be drunk,” said Mr Raj Kumar Prasad, chief of the Halsi police station, which oversees 50 villages, including Bandol.

But that has changed, said the authorities and villagers, adding that the law imposing severe penalties for the sale and consumption of alcohol seems to have worked remarkably well. The crime rate has fallen sharply, show government figures, and spending on things such as motorbikes and appliances have risen significantly. And almost everyone credits the vigilance of the women of Bihar for most of the law’s success.

It all began nearly two years ago, when Bihar’s Chief Minister, Nitish Kumar, was in the fight of his political life against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the party of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Mr Kumar had just addressed a meeting at a convention hall in July when a woman approached the microphone. “Brother, ban alcohol,” she said.

For reasons he still cannot quite explain, Mr Kumar said he pledged: “If I get elected, I will ban alcohol.”

Those words flew onto the front pages of the country’s newspapers, and there was no turning back. The day after he was re-elected, in an overwhelming defeat of the BJP, Mr Kumar began drawing up a draconian law imposing maximum sentences of seven years for drinking alcohol and life in prison for making it.

There were no exceptions for medical conditions or tourist hotels — reasons that prohibition had failed elsewhere, he said.

The measure took effect last April. Mr Kumar had planned to enact the law in stages, beginning in rural areas. But protesters prevented liquor stores from opening in the state capital, Patna, even though they were still legal under the first stage of the ban.

The public — particularly women — was energised. Between 200 and 300 complaints a day came in to police hotlines and email accounts, said Mr Alok Raj, who, as the additional director-general of police, took the lead in enforcing the law.

Women had long complained that alcohol was impoverishing their families, said Mr Kumar, 66. The results in the year since the measure has been in effect bear those grievances out.

Murders and gang robberies are down almost 20 per cent from a year earlier, and riots 13 per cent. Fatal traffic accidents fell 10 per cent.

At the same time, household spending has risen, with milk sales up more than 10 per cent and cheese sales growing 200 per cent six months after the ban. Sales of two-wheeled vehicles rose more than 30 per cent, while sales of electrical appliances rose 50 per cent. Brick houses are rising in villages where mud huts used to predominate.

Not everyone is happy. More than 42,000 people have been arrested under the new law and are awaiting trial. The people who made a living turning rice and fruit juice into alcoholic drinks — often the poorest, lowest-caste residents — have been pushed into lower-paying jobs as day labourers. Night life in Patna has been subdued, as many restaurants that used to serve alcohol have closed, their revenue down as much as 50 per cent.

“The quantum of punishment is too high,” said Mr Jitan Ram Manjhi, a former chief minister of Bihar. “This is unfair.” He supports prohibition but noted that even armed robbery carried a lower sentence.

In January last year, before the prohibition law was enacted, the women of Bandol made their first collective effort at stamping out alcohol. About 100 descended on a mud hut where liquor was being sold, forcing it to close and dragging the proprietor off to the police station.

Next, groups of women began showing up at the homes of the biggest drinkers in the village, demanding them to stop.

One of the first was Mr Omprakash Ram Chandrawanshi, 35. “Behave, or we’ll get tough,” they told him, recalled his wife, Soni Devi Chandrawanshi. They shouted: “Just like we took that store owner in to the police, we’ll take you in.”

Ms Soni Chandrawanshi said her husband had sat quietly, his head lowered, as the women berated him. “I think he thought, ‘If they did that to the store owner, they’ll do it to me’,” she said.

Mr Omprakash Chandrawanshi, a lean man sitting in a plastic chair outside the room he shares with his wife and three children, said the group had scared him out of a habit that had made him miserable.

“If I earned 500 rupees (S$11), I would spend 200 on alcohol,” he said. He earns the equivalent of about US$200 a month as a driver, he said, but “I often wouldn’t bring any money home”.

Now, his family is able not only to buy more food, but also to pay for tutorials to help the children in school, he said. They have also been able to expand the brick house shared by the extended family.

So taken were Mr Chandrawanshi and several reformed drinkers with a new, sober life that they have joined the women’s vigilante group in harassing and identifying illegal alcohol operations. THE NEW YORK TIMES