Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

A stronger Indian-American alliance?

When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi invited United States President Barack Obama to attend his country’s Republic Day ceremonies earlier this year, it signalled an important change in relations between the world’s two biggest democracies.

Mr Obama (centre)  with Mr Modi (in turban and sunglasses) after attending the Republic Day parade in New Delhi on Jan 26. India’s success is an important US interest. Photo: Reuters

Mr Obama (centre) with Mr Modi (in turban and sunglasses) after attending the Republic Day parade in New Delhi on Jan 26. India’s success is an important US interest. Photo: Reuters

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi invited United States President Barack Obama to attend his country’s Republic Day ceremonies earlier this year, it signalled an important change in relations between the world’s two biggest democracies.

Ever since the 1990s, three American administrations have tried to improve bilateral relations, with mixed results. While annual trade between the countries has soared during this period, from US$20 billion (S$28 billion) to more than US$100 billion, annual US-China trade is worth six times more and the political relationship has had its ups and downs.

India and America have a long history of confusing each other. By definition, any alliance with a superpower is unequal; so efforts to establish close ties with the US have long run up against India’s tradition of strategic autonomy.

But Americans do not view democratic India as a threat. On the contrary, India’s success is an important US interest, and several factors promise a brighter future for the bilateral relationship.

The most important factor is the acceleration in India’s economic growth, which the International Monetary Fund projects will exceed 7.5 per cent through 2020.

For decades, India suffered from what some called the “Hindu rate of economic growth”: A little more than 
1 per cent a year. It might more properly have been called a 1930s British socialist rate of growth.

After independence in 1947, India adopted an inward-looking planning system that focused on heavy industry. Market-oriented reforms in the early 1990s changed that pattern, and annual growth accelerated to 
7 per cent under the Congress party, before slumping to 5 per cent.

Since last year’s general election brought Mr Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party to power, the government has reversed the slowdown.

And prospects for continued growth are strong. India has an emerging middle class of several hundred million, and English is an official language spoken by about 50 to 100 million. Building on that base, Indian information industries are able to play a major global role.

Moreover, with a population of 1.2 billion people, India is four times larger than the US and likely to surpass China by 2025.

Its sheer scale will be increasingly important not only to the global economy, but also to balancing China’s influence in Asia and managing global issues such as climate change, public health and cybersecurity.

India also has significant military power, with an estimated 90 to 100 nuclear weapons, intermediate-range missiles, 1.3 million military personnel and an annual military expenditure of nearly US$50 billion (3 per cent of the world total).

And, in terms of soft power, India has an established democracy, an influential diaspora and a vibrant popular culture with transnational influence. Bollywood produces more films every year than any other country, outcompeting Hollywood in parts of Asia and the Middle East.

BALANCE OF POWER

However, one should not underestimate India’s problems. Population alone is not a source of power unless these human resources are developed, and India has lagged well behind 
China in terms of literacy and economic growth.

Despite its progress, around a third of India’s population lives in conditions of acute poverty, making the country home to a third of the world’s poor.

India’s US$2 trillion GDP is only a fifth of China’s US$10 trillion and a ninth of America’s US$17.5 trillion (measured at market exchange rates).

Likewise, India’s annual per capita income of US$1,760 is just one-fifth that of China’s. Even more striking, while 95 per cent of the Chinese population is literate, the proportion for India is only 74 per cent – and only 65 per cent for women.

A symptom of this problem is India’s poor performance in international comparisons of universities, with none ranked among the world’s top 100. The nation’s high-tech exports are only 5 per cent of its total exports, compared with 30 per cent for China.

India is unlikely to develop the power to become a global challenger to the US in the first half of this century. Indeed, even in terms of soft power, a recent study by the Portland Consultancy in London placed India outside the top 30 countries. China ranked 30th, and the US came in third, behind the United Kingdom and Germany.

Nonetheless, India has considerable assets that already affect the balance of power in Asia. While India and China signed agreements in 1993 and 1996 that promised a peaceful settlement of the border dispute that led them to war in 1962, the issue has heated up again following Chinese 
actions in recent years.

India and China are fellow members of the BRICS (along with Brazil, Russia and South Africa). But cooperation within that caucus is limited.

While Indian officials are often discreet in public about relations with China, and wisely want bilateral trade and investment to grow, their security concerns remain acute. As part of the group of Asian countries that will tend to balance China, India has already begun to strengthen its diplomatic relations with Japan.

It would be a mistake to cast the prospects for an improved US-India relationship solely in terms of China’s rising power. Indian economic success is an American interest on its own. So is the open approach taken by India and Brazil on issues such as governance of the Internet, at a time when Russia and China are seeking more authoritarian control. No one should expect an Indian-American alliance any time soon, given historical Indian public opinion. However, one can predict a relationship in the coming years that will be both sui generis 
and stronger. PROJECT SYNDICATE

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Joseph S. Nye is a professor at Harvard. Since 2002, he has co-chaired a US-India Strategic Dialogue under the auspices of the Aspen Institute.

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.