Mediation to play bigger role in medical lawsuits: CJ Menon
SINGAPORE — Changes are in store for medical lawsuits, with mediation to play a bigger role, and judges to pro-actively direct proceedings with help from medical experts.
The measures are being evaluated, Chief Justice (CJ) Sundaresh Menon said at the opening of the legal year today (Jan 11), and the aim is to avoid medical practice that is negatively influenced by the threat of litigation from malpractice — which would lead to “defensive medicine” and higher insurance costs.
The courts want to promote alternative dispute resolution in resolving medical malpractice disputes, so that lawsuits are avoided where possible. The Singapore Mediation Centre has been tasked to support the medical profession in this, CJ Menon said.
He added that a judge-led process would be a shift away from the present adversarial model, and could be more conducive to fact-finding. Judges, who may lack the specialised knowledge of doctors, could receive more help than is the case now from experts, called medical assessors. The courts and the Singapore Medical Council (SMC), which regulates more than 12,000 doctors, have agreed on some initial steps. A panel of medical assessors made up of senior doctors nominated by SMC will be set up. The High Court and State Courts will have a list of judges to handle medical litigation cases, and the Singapore Judicial College will work with the SMC to provide training for judges and medical assessors.
Two High Court judges, Justices Judith Prakash and Belinda Ang, will lead efforts to refine court procedures in this area. “To strike the right balance and ensure that medical practice is not distorted by the fear of litigation, some re-imagination of our medical litigation paradigm is timely,” the Chief Justice said.
Calls for a more inquiry-based process when charges are levelled against a doctor have been made before. In 2014, the SMC agreed it could be guided by the inquisitorial framework similar to that of the family court, following recommendations by a committee tasked to improve the disciplinary process for doctors.
Lawyers and doctors said the changes could mean earlier resolution of cases and levelling of the playing field for patients, who would normally have less resources than insured doctors and large firms to pursue their cases.
Senior Counsel Edwin Tong explained that without a medical assessor, a judge could be very dependent on parties in the lawsuit and their experts to isolate and identify issues before hearing the evidence. A judge-led process with an assessor allows the judge to understand the issues ahead of time, making issues much more digestible and very focused at the trial.
Senior Counsel N Sreenivasan pointed out that in medical litigation, the cost of achieving a fair outcome in an adversarial system may outweigh its benefits. With the changes, cost savings would “hopefully be translated into higher awards or higher agreed settlement amounts to the patient”.
The Singapore Medical Association, which represents the bulk of doctors here, said medical care is of direct concern to all Singaporeans and advocates alternative dispute resolution. Its president Wong Tien Hua said that the problem of defensive medicine needs to be addressed before it spirals out of control, as is the situation in Western countries. Singapore’s present system of medical litigation would invariably lead to increasing insurance cost for doctors and, in turn, medical costs, he added.