Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Pistorius trial: Judge begins reading verdict

PRETORIA (South Africa) — The judge in the Oscar Pistorius murder trial today (Sept 11) read the reasoning behind her upcoming verdict on whether the double-amputee athlete intentionally killed girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp and appeared to initially agree with parts of Pistorius’ account that it was a mistaken killing.

Judge Thokozile Masipa reads notes as she delivers her verdict in the Oscar Pistorius murder trial in Pretoria, South Africa, Sept 11 2014. Photo: AP

Judge Thokozile Masipa reads notes as she delivers her verdict in the Oscar Pistorius murder trial in Pretoria, South Africa, Sept 11 2014. Photo: AP

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

PRETORIA (South Africa) — The judge in the Oscar Pistorius murder trial today (Sept 11) read the reasoning behind her upcoming verdict on whether the double-amputee athlete intentionally killed girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp and appeared to initially agree with parts of Pistorius’ account that it was a mistaken killing.

Judge Thokozile Masipa told Pistorius he could remain seated on a wooden bench in the South African courtroom until she asked him to stand, and then proceeded to explain her assessment of the testimonies of some of the 37 witnesses who testified at the double-amputee Olympian’s dramatic trial. This verdict phase was expected to take hours and possibly even two days to fully read out.

Casting doubt on witness accounts of hearing a woman’s screams, Judge Masipa said “none of the witnesses had ever heard the accused cry or scream, let alone when he was anxious”, apparently acknowledging the possibility that the defence argument that Pistorius had been screaming in a high-pitched voice.

“That in itself poses a challenge,” Judge Masipa said of the fact that neighbour’s had never previously heard Pistorius scream and had no “model” to compare with the screams they heard on the night of Steenkamp’s death.

At one point, Judge Masipa said: “I continue to explain why most witnesses got their facts wrong.”

She also said she was disregarding telephone text messages between the couple that had been entered as evidence — prosecutors had submitted text messages that showed tension between them in an attempt to prove that Pistorius had a motive to kill his girlfriend, while the defence submitted messages that indicated mutual affection.

That evidence, the judge said, doesn’t prove anything.

“Normal relationships are dynamic and unpredictable most of the time, while human beings are fickle,” she said.

Pistorius faces 25 years to life in prison if convicted of premeditated murder for fatally shooting Steenkamp in his home in the pre-dawn hours of Feb 14, last year. He also faces years in jail if found guilty of murder without pre-planning, or of negligent killing. Pistorius could also be acquitted if Judge Masipa believes he made a tragic error.

Pistorius has said he mistakenly shot Steenkamp through the closed door of a toilet cubicle, thinking there was an intruder in his home and pleaded not guilty to murder. The prosecution alleges the athlete intentionally killed her after a loud quarrel, which was heard by neighbours.

A key part of the prosecution’s case was its assertion that Steenkamp screamed during a late-night alleged fight with Pistorius before he killed her. But the judge said some of those witnesses who testified to hearing a woman scream in the pre-dawn hours of Feb 14 last year were “genuinely mistaken in what they heard, as the chronology will show”.

That appeared to indicate that the defence had succeeded in raising doubts that Steenkamp ever screamed. The defence says the screaming was instead Pistorius, who was traumatised and desperately calling for help in a high-pitched voice after realising he had shot Steenkamp in error.

The judge also cited testimony of an acoustics expert called by the defence, saying it cast “serious doubt” on whether witnesses who were hundreds of metres away in their homes — as some state witnesses were — could have differentiated between the screams of a man or a woman.

Earlier, Judge Masipa began by outlining in detail the four charges against the Olympic runner: Murder, two counts of unlawfully firing a gun in a public place in unrelated incidents and one count of illegal possession of ammunition.

Pistorius sat looking straight ahead in the direction of the judge as she was explaining her upcoming decision from documents on a stand in front of her. Her two legal aides sat on either side.

Before the session began, Pistorius hugged his brother Carl, who was seated in a wheelchair because of injuries suffered in a recent car crash.

The parents of Steenkamp, the 29-year-old model fatally shot by Pistorius, were also in the packed gallery. Other members of Pistorius’ family, including his father Henke, sat behind him.

If Pistorius is convicted on any charge, the case will likely be postponed until a later sentencing hearing.

There were many journalists at the courthouse, where the sensational trial has unfolded over the last six months. AP

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.