Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Automated tray return systems punish the old and the needy

I refer to the report “Pay for your tray; Two hawker centres to start charging deposits for food trays” (January 29).

A TODAY reader says NEA should be finding ways to assist the needy and the elderly, instead of imposing a penalty if they do not return their trays, which smacks of high-handedness. TODAY file photo

A TODAY reader says NEA should be finding ways to assist the needy and the elderly, instead of imposing a penalty if they do not return their trays, which smacks of high-handedness. TODAY file photo

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

I refer to the report “Pay for your tray; Two hawker centres to start charging deposits for food trays” (January 29).

It is easier to change the behaviour and mindset of the young rather than the old. Part of the reason tray return initiatives did not go down well with the seniors is that many have mobility problems of varying degree. Balancing a tray of crockery may prove difficult for some.

There are also needy persons who have barely enough funds for meals. To avoid setting aside an extra dollar for tray deposits, some may patronise other outlets.

The National Environment Agency (NEA) should be finding ways to assist these people, instead of imposing a penalty if they do not return their trays, which smacks of high-handedness.

Bukit Merah Central is in the mature estate of Redhill, where many seniors reside. The NEA would do well to consider the demographics of an estate before rolling out future measures.

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.