Balance between public, private institutions needed

There is a perception here that a jobseeker with a degree from a local university has an advantage in the job market over another with a private degree. With the increasing legitimacy of private degrees, though, such a perception is a myth.

One has to ask whether, at the end of their careers, the fates of our local universities’ alumni are vastly different from their counterparts from private universities (“Unrealistic to think universities are all equal”; Nov 25).

Our universities rank above private ones as Singapore’s education system is of repute. Their degrees ease entry into government jobs and help secure higher starting pay in the private sector. However, we should not have the mindset that graduates of private universities are of a lower rung.

In the public sector, there is more concern over whether a degree comes from a list of approved institutions. In the private sector, unless one graduates from one of the world’s top few universities, most companies are not too particular about it.

One’s experience and interpersonal traits are more important and employers would reward staff according to their competence. Unfortunately, though, some companies are particular about the branding of degrees and universities.

Nonetheless, with the establishment of the Council for Private Education as a regulator, graduates of private universities should rest assured that the education they received is accounted for and legitimate.

We need a balance between public and private universities. And students should consider their options and priorities carefully depending on which sector they intend to join.

If they face financial constraints, but have good leadership potential and A-level results, for example, they can apply for scholarships to chart a career in the Civil Service.

Ultimately, though, everyone is evaluated on individual performance and subject to meritocracy.