Causes of social divides complex
I refer to the report “Siting flats further from city ‘may widen S’pore’s social divide’” (Feb 28). My perspective is different: Housing type, either public or private, and location do not necessarily hinder or weaken social mobility, interactions and bonding.
I refer to the report “Siting flats further from city ‘may widen S’pore’s social divide’” (Feb 28). My perspective is different: Housing type, either public or private, and location do not necessarily hinder or weaken social mobility, interactions and bonding.
Hence, there is no direct and close link with social stratification. Even if there is any impact, it would be minimal. In any society with the problems of social stratification, the causes could be complex. Singapore would be no exception.
First, inexpedient, miscalculated and lopsided policies due to political factors could potentially divide the people of a country; some countries fall in this bracket. Second, a sluggish economy might weaken the bonds of its people.
Third, poor literacy and low education levels might aggravate poverty because the people would lack employable skills. This affects a country’s unity too.
Once these issues are dealt with sufficiently, and there is good supporting infrastructure, such as efficient transport and leisure facilities, connectivity improves.
In due course, as with Singapore, the objectives of consolidating racial harmony and strengthening the people’s bonds can be achieved.