Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Crux of smoking issue is personal responsibility

I agree with the writer of “Ban on tobacco would lead to better health, savings on medical costs” (July 2) that the air around us has become more polluted through the years.

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp
Francis Valentine Tan

I agree with the writer of “Ban on tobacco would lead to better health, savings on medical costs” (July 2) that the air around us has become more polluted through the years.

Such pollution, however, does not come from smoking alone, but also from irresponsible motorists and haze.

We live in a cosmopolitan society, unlike Bhutan; hence, a total ban on tobacco is almost impossible to impose. Smokers living here, as well as tourists, may find it tough to accept.

It does not make sense for an open economy that relies heavily on external trade.

Would there one day be a ban on liquor, or a ban on driving too, since accidents are happening daily?

Living healthily is often a personal choice. But should an obese person be punished for his eating habits with higher MediShield premiums? Having lived in our multiracial, multi religious society, one should practise more patience when dealing with differences.

Responsible smokers seem like outcasts nowadays, confined to restricted zones to take a puff. Nevertheless, acceptance of our laws is the only choice for smokers if they are to avoid a fine or corrective work order.

The crux of the matter is responsibility. Let us educate them or fine them for smoking irresponsibly. After all, responsible smokers do help build our economy and pay high taxes on duty-paid cigarettes.

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.