Encourage debate on National Service

That Singapore needs a strong military, in which conscription continues to feature, is hard to dispute, and Mr Ho Shu Huang’s commentary “How do people view national security?” (Feb 17) makes a strong case for a long-term defence posture.

But it is less clear whether those who give priority to national defence can be persuaded that these “long-term security concerns cannot unconditionally eclipse immediate and real bread-and-butter concerns”.

In this vein, to shape perceptions of National Service, younger Singaporeans should be involved in related discussions. The perceived absence of threats necessitates stronger engagement on the “vulnerability” narrative Mr Ho emphasised.

However, such discourse should not be didactic. Instead of overwhelming participants with talking points or rehashed arguments, they should be encouraged to articulate personal perspectives.

There may have been missed opportunities during the Committee to Strengthen NS endeavour, when little attention was given to the pillars of defence and deterrence upon which conscription is premised.

Young Singaporeans should be asked for feedback beyond the present suite of surveys and convinced through conversations, not refrains such as the maintenance of a “defence posture”, which might be eclipsed by more immediate worries as Mr Ho mentioned.

For instance, how do they value the military and its conscription policies? Do perceptions change after NS?

Are they convinced by the prevailing narrative, and how should the Government respond to bright-eyed suggestions that Singapore, sans a sizeable force, can rely on diplomatic overtures or its allies when crisis strikes?

The answers might seem straightforward for the Government, yet it is the engagement process that matters. Tedious as it may be, individuals should not be told why conscription is necessary, but be encouraged to debate its relevance.