Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Probe into orientation camps: NUS should make findings public

I refer to “Orientation fundamentally beneficial, and NUS will bring it back: Ong Ye Kung” (Aug 17), which reported that the National University of Singapore (NUS) plans to continue holding freshmen orientation activities — which had been halted over inappropriate behaviour at some camps — for this year’s cohort.

I refer to “Orientation fundamentally beneficial, and NUS will bring it back: Ong Ye Kung” (Aug 17), which reported that the National University of Singapore (NUS) plans to continue holding freshmen orientation activities — which had been halted over inappropriate behaviour at some camps — for this year’s cohort.

With a commitment to improve oversight, NUS should eventually make its investigation findings public, specify the transgressions uncovered, and outline in greater detail how improvements will take shape.

In particular, many will expect the university to pay greater attention to sex and sexuality education, beyond the convenient references to the “rules and processes” that may have been in place, but which do not appear to be adequate.

The aim is not to name and shame (unless, of course, the wrongdoings are truly reprehensible) but to be specific about what has gone wrong.

The discourse that transpired after The New Paper report on sexualised activities at recent orientation camps — on social media and the mainstream media, through conversations within NUS, and perhaps even in Parliament — is premised upon personal anecdotes or assumptions, often resulting in groups talking over one another.

Information about what actually happened, or what has actually been happening, in recent camps and years should then form the basis for greater accountability and action.

It may even be useful to understand how the NUS administration has gone about its investigations, and whether there are safe channels for whistleblowers.

If it is truly serious, the administration could trace back to determine how pervasive the problems have been, maybe since years ago.

For students within the university — notwithstanding the point made by Acting Education Minister (Higher Education) Ong Ye Kung that student-organisers of these camps are subject to briefings and are required to submit “detailed orientation proposals” — a discussion about the intent and design of an orientation programme may also be timely.

What do prospective and current undergraduates expect from orientation? How effective have activities been, based broadly on numbers if possible and not just personal tales, and do benefits accrue to the wider population?

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.