Single flag-down fare system puts cabbies, passengers on equal ground
I do not see the merit of a more complicated dynamic scheme to charge taxi fares. (“Use dynamic instead of fixed taxi surcharges”; Oct 15)
I do not see the merit of a more complicated dynamic scheme to charge taxi fares. (“Use dynamic instead of fixed taxi surcharges”; Oct 15)
Relying on such technology for payment is fraught with security problems. Imagine the consequences if the Global Positioning System were disrupted. In the taxi industry, nothing beats the time-tested system of a single flag-down fare plus a charge for distance travelled.
The only surcharge needed may be at the airport or after midnight. It is simple, fair and reliable and has been in use around the world since taxis became part of public transport systems.
However, when variables such as a schedule of surcharges were introduced, unhealthy complications set in at the expense of commuters. Like bus and train drivers, cabbies should not need incentives to earn a living. It is their profession to ferry passengers.
If the industry in Hong Kong and London can operate efficiently with only 2.6 and 3.3 taxis per 1,000 people, respectively, why do we need 5.2 taxis to serve the city, yet passengers cannot get one when they need them most?
The key to a comfortable taxi ride is simplicity, hinging on productivity and quality services in a healthy industry. Cabs should be always on the move to earn fares and meet commuter needs at various times.
With a single flag-down fare system, cabbies and passengers are on equal ground. Cabbies then have to work harder to earn more, like any other worker. When taxis are easily available, there would be no need for cumbersome phone bookings.