Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Test-centred training still an issue in IPPT

While I appreciate the reasons for the changes to the Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT), there were deeper issues left unaddressed.

While I appreciate the reasons for the changes to the Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT), there were deeper issues left unaddressed.

One has to do with the Singapore Armed Forces’ training methods. While there have been some changes in recent years, I observe that there is fundamentally a lack of knowledge on how to train servicemen for the IPPT.

Many instructors, whether they are military commanders or physical training specialists, tend to adopt a repetitive testing approach to training sessions. For example, a time-trial mentality is still prevalent for the 2.4km run.

Many sessions involve all-out efforts over the test distance, with the goal being to run faster the next time. There is little concept of the progressive build-up of running ability in terms of the various components of running fitness.

Test-centred training makes the run an obstacle to overcome, rather than a beneficial activity.

This tends to breed a dread of running as an activity, which servicemen tend to carry over to their operationally ready phase, when they must train on their own.

For the standing broad jump and shuttle run, more than technique is required. There are issues of balance, power, agility, coordination, flexibility as well as specific hip and core strength.

Simply jumping and running repetitively to go further and faster is not the way. Knowing of no other way to train effectively to meet standards than to go all out, many servicemen find little motivation to train regularly.

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.