Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

How speech for Melania Trump stumbled towards ridicule

CLEVELAND (Ohio) — It was the biggest speech of Ms Melania Trump’s life, and her husband, Donald, wanted it to be perfect.

Melania Trump, left, on Monday, and Michelle Obama in 2008. Photos: AP

Melania Trump, left, on Monday, and Michelle Obama in 2008. Photos: AP

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

CLEVELAND (Ohio) — It was the biggest speech of Ms Melania Trump’s life, and her husband, Donald, wanted it to be perfect.

The Trump campaign turned to two high-powered speechwriters, who had helped write signature political oratory like Mr George W. Bush’s speech to the nation on Sept 11, 2001, to introduce the Slovenian-born former model to the nation on the opening night of the Republican National Convention.

It did not go as planned and has eclipsed much of the action at the party gathering in Cleveland, where delegates on Tuesday night formally nominated Mr Donald Trump for president.

The speechwriters, Mr Matthew Scully and Mr John McConnell, sent Ms Trump a draft last month, eager for her approval.

Weeks went by. They heard nothing.

Inside Trump Tower, it turned out, she had decided she was uncomfortable with the text and began tearing it apart, leaving a fraction of the original.

Her quiet plan to wrest it away and make it her own set in motion the most embarrassing moment of the convention: Word-for-word repetition of phrases and borrowed themes from Ms Michelle Obama’s speech at the Democratic convention eight years ago.

The ridicule from both Democrats and Republicans was instant and relentless, disrupting what was meant to be a high point of the convention.

It was, by all accounts, an entirely preventable blunder, committed in front of an audience of 23 million television viewers, that exposed the weaknesses of an organisation that has long spurned the safeguards of a modern presidential campaign, such as the free software that detects plagiarism.

“It just shouldn’t have happened,” said Mr Matt Latimer, a White House speechwriter for President George W. Bush. “This was an easy home run speech: A successful, attractive immigrant talking about her husband.”

Nobody seemed more startled than the Trumps, who arrived in New York City on Tuesday morning (July 19) after a flight from Cleveland to find themselves at the centre of a bizarre uproar over authenticity, plagiarism and a knotty question: Why did the wife of the Republican nominee borrow passages from the wife of the current Democratic president?

Ms Trump spent most of Tuesday out of sight, while her husband vented his frustration and anger throughout the day.

This account of how a speech written by professionals was transformed into the problematic version delivered on Monday night at the Quicken Loans Arena is based on interviews with more than a dozen people involved in and close to the Trump campaign, many of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose details that were supposed to remain confidential.

It reinforces dominant themes of Mr Trump’s campaign that still linger from the primary, which his team has struggled to change: A deliberately bare-bones campaign structure, a slapdash style and a reliance on the instincts of the candidate over the judgments of experienced political experts, like Mr Scully and Mr McConnell.

The two original speechwriters were not aware of how significantly the speech had been changed until they saw Ms Trump deliver it on television on Monday night, along with the rest of the country.

In the prime time address, she unfurled a sequence of life lessons — about how “your word is your bond,” about “your dreams and your willingness to work for them,” and the “integrity, passion and intelligence” of her parents — in the same sequence and using much of the same language that Ms Obama had employed in 2008. Just like Ms Obama, Ms Trump explained how she wanted to pass those lessons on to her children and the children of the world. And just like Ms Obama, she offered a gauzy invocation about the limitlessness of aspirations when they are matched by determination.

In a series of evolving explanations, Trump aides and allies dismissed the episode as a trivial distraction, alternating between outright denial that the speech had used word-for-word phrases from Ms Obama and blaming the media.

“Ninety-three percent of the speech is completely different,” declared Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey. Mr Paul Manafort, Mr Trump’s campaign chairman, pegged the number of suspicious words at 50. “And that includes ‘ands’ and ‘thes’ and things like that,” he said on Tuesday.

Across the country, slack-jawed Republican political operatives and speechwriters expressed expletive-laden bewilderment at the organisational breakdown allowing such an episode to occur.

“It’s like some guy trying to paddle across a river in a rowboat who shoots a hole in his boat,” said Mr Stuart Stevens, who wrote speeches for Mr Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, throughout the 2012 campaign.

In interviews, alarmed Republican speechwriters outlined the layers of formal scrutiny, apparently disregarded by the Trump campaign, traditionally applied to almost every draft of a major convention address. They described word-by-word fact-checking by a dedicated team of experts and computer software designed to catch plagiarism. Several online programs, like DupliChecker, are available at no cost.

 

It was Mr Jared Kushner, Mr Trump’s son-in-law and top adviser, who commissioned the speech from Mr Scully and Mr McConnell.

But Ms Trump decided to revise it, and at one point she turned to a trusted hand: Ms Meredith McIver, a New York City-based former ballet dancer and English major who has worked on some of Mr Trump’s books, including Think Like A Billionaire. It was not clear how much of a hand Ms McIver had in the final product, and she did not respond to an email on Tuesday.

Research for the speech, it seems, drew them to the previous convention speeches delivered by candidate’s spouses.

The Trump campaign declined to say who or how many senior campaign officials had read or reviewed the speech.

But when Ms Trump and her staff had finished revising the speech, virtually all that remained from the original was an introduction and a passage that included the phrase “a national campaign like no other”.

 

To many Republicans, the lapse seemed frustratingly inevitable from a candidate who has not just eschewed the backstops of a major political campaign — he has mocked them as a waste of money. His campaign slogans, “America First” and “Make America Great Again”, echoed Mr Pat Buchanan and Ronald Reagan. His social media graphics were crowdsourced on Twitter and Reddit by an aide who formerly managed Mr Trump’s golf club in Westchester.

The mistakes have piled up. Last summer, Mr Trump posted on Twitter his portrait superimposed over a picture of the White House and what turned out to be a stock image of Waffen-SS troops from World War II.

But this one stung, in part because everybody was watching.

NEW YORK TIMES

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.