News media, target of Trump’s declaration of war, expresses alarm

NEW YORK — For wary Washington journalists, it seemed only a matter of time before Donald J. Trump’s presidency would lead to a high-tension standoff between his administration and the news media.

But on Day 1?

The news media world found itself in a state of shock on Sunday, a day after Mr. Trump declared himself in “a running war with the media” and the president’s press secretary, Mr Sean Spicer, used his first appearance on the White House podium to deliver a fiery jeremiad against the press.

Worse, many journalists said, were the falsehoods that sprang from the lips of both Mr Trump and Mr Spicer on Saturday. Mr Trump accused the news media of confecting a battle between himself and the intelligence services (in fact, he had previously compared the services to Nazi Germany in a Twitter post). And among other easily debunked assertions, Mr. Spicer falsely claimed that Mr. Trump’s inauguration was the most attended in history (photographs indicated it was not).

“It was absolutely surprising and stunning,” the president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, Jeff Mason, said on CNN on Sunday (Jan 22). In a phone interview later, Mr Mason said: “People were surprised. I was surprised. It’s not what I was expecting for the first statement by the press secretary in the press room.”

The tensions flared anew on Sunday when Ms Kellyanne Conway, one of Mr Trump’s top advisers, said in a television interview that Mr Spicer had merely presented “alternative facts” about the inauguration, prompting an astonished response from her questioner, Mr Chuck Todd of NBC.

“Wait a minute — ‘alternative facts’?” Mr Todd asked Ms. Conway on Meet The Press. “Look, alternative facts are not facts. They’re falsehoods.”

When Mr Todd pressed her about why the administration had put Mr Spicer behind the lectern for the first time to “utter a provable falsehood”, Ms Conway responded with a sharp threat. “If we’re going to keep referring to our press secretary in those types of terms, I think that we’re going to have to rethink our relationship here,” she said.

Video of Ms Conway’s evasion quickly spread on social media. The phrases “alternative facts” and “#alternativefacts” had been used on Twitter more than 380,000 times by midafternoon on Sunday, a Twitter spokesman said.

Also by Sunday afternoon, there were scattered calls for the White House press corps to boycott Mr. Spicer’s briefings, although such a drastic response appeared unlikely.

Mr Ben Smith, the editor in chief of BuzzFeed, said on Sunday that the briefings were “a useful, if not essential, tradition” and that his outlet would keep a reporter there. Mr. Smith added that the Trump administration would “find practical reasons to be honest.”

“In particular,” Mr Smith wrote in an email, “I think they’ll find in moments of real crisis, rather than political theatre, that they need to win back the credibility that they are spending now.”

Mr Mason, the correspondents’ association president, who is the chief liaison between the White House press corps and Mr Spicer, said his goal was to maintain a constructive relationship.

“It’s up to him and up to the president to decide how they want to get started,” Mr Mason said of Mr Spicer. “And that’s what they decided.”

Some reporters and commentators noted that hostility between White House press operations and the news media was nothing new.

Mr Jack Shafer, the acerbic media critic, wrote on Twitter that “the press is supposed to be abused, disparaged, defamed, dissed”. He added, “It’s part of the job.”

Lynn Sweet, a political reporter for The Chicago Sun-Times, said credibility, not civility, was what mattered. “If Sean wants to have an angry tone, frankly, I don’t care,” Ms Sweet said on CNN. “I don’t care if you vent.”

She added: “I care if he says something that’s true. I care if he gives us facts.”

In an interview on Sunday, Mr Ari Fleischer, who served as press secretary under George W Bush, said that Mr Spicer’s statements on Saturday were somewhat typical of the spin at press briefings.

But Mr Spicer’s “eagerness and willingness” to confront the press corps so directly represented a break from tradition, Mr Fleischer said. “Everybody complains about the press, but most people bite their tongue” in news conferences, Mr Fleischer said.

Mr Fleischer added that Mr Spicer’s remarks could hurt his credibility unless he backed them up — or at least addressed them — during the first official White House briefing on Monday.

“Sean’s first client is the president of the United States and those around the president; his second client is the press corps,” Mr Fleischer said. “And he has to serve both, always guided by the truth.”

In reporting on the day’s events, many news organizations also called out the falsehoods that Mr Trump and Mr Spicer offered on Saturday, using variations of “false,” “falsehoods” and“lies” in headlines and stories. Breitbart News, the right-wing website that has embraced Mr Trump, was more credulous in its headline: WH Press Secretary Sean Spicer Blasts Media’s ‘Deliberately False Reporting’.

Voice Of America, the government-funded news operation that broadcasts American journalism beyond the country’s borders, pointed out Mr Spicer’s inaccuracies and ran an article from The Associated Press fact-checking his remarks.

Still, that came only after the organisation initially posted a string of Twitter messages that quoted Mr Spicer without context, prompting questions about whether it was endorsing his comments. Voice Of America’s director, Ms Amanda Bennett, said that there had been no instructions or interference from the Trump administration and that Voice Of America had quickly decided it needed to provide more explanation.

“Internally, there was like an explosion of direct messages saying you’ve got to do something about this,” Ms Bennett said in an interview on Sunday.

That led to a course correction on Twitter, including the deletion of one tweet that appeared to support Mr Spicer. For First Amendment advocates, the events of Mr Trump’s first 48 hours in office were, to say the least, unsettling.

In a statement, the American Civil Liberties Union denounced Mr Spicer’s remarks as “possible government censorship” and vowed that any threats by Mr Trump’s administration to the principles of freedom of the press would be met with a “vigorous defense” of the First Amendment.

“If Trump wants to take on the First Amendment,” the group said in the statement, “we will see him in court.” THE NEW YORK TIMES