Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Security questioned in probe of attack on US envoy to Seoul

SEOUL — Police today (March 6) investigated the motive of the anti-US activist they say slashed the US ambassador to South Korea, as questions turned to whether security was neglected.

In this Thursday, March 5, 2015 image taken from a video footage released by Yonhap News TV via Yonhap News Agency, US Ambassador to South Korea Mark Lippert, second from left, arrives at Severance hospital after undergoing surgery to his face and arms in Seoul, South Korea. Photo: AP

In this Thursday, March 5, 2015 image taken from a video footage released by Yonhap News TV via Yonhap News Agency, US Ambassador to South Korea Mark Lippert, second from left, arrives at Severance hospital after undergoing surgery to his face and arms in Seoul, South Korea. Photo: AP

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

SEOUL — Police today (March 6) investigated the motive of the anti-US activist they say slashed the US ambassador to South Korea, as questions turned to whether security was neglected.

The attack yesterday on Mark Lippert, which prompted rival North Korea to gloat about “knife slashes of justice”, left deep gashes on his face and hand and damaged tendons and nerves. It also raised safety worries in a city with a reputation as a relatively low-risk diplomatic posting, despite regular threats of war from North Korea.

While an extreme example, the attack is the latest act of political violence in a deeply divided country where some protesters portray their causes as matters of life and death.

Mr Lippert, 42, was recovering well but complaining of pain in the wound near his left wrist and a finger where doctors repaired nerve damage, Severance Hospital official Yoon Do-Heum said in a televised briefing. Doctors plan to remove the 80 stitches on Lippert’s face on Monday or Tuesday and expect him to be out of the hospital by Tuesday or Wednesday. Hospital officials say he may experience sensory problems in his left hand for several months.

Police, meanwhile, searched the offices and house of the suspect Kim Ki-jong, 55, and seized hundreds of documents, books and computer files. Police also obtained Kim’s telecommunication and financial transaction records to help investigate how the attack was planned and whether others were involved, police officials said in a televised briefing.

Seoul Central District Court was expected to decide later today whether to grant a police request for Kim’s formal arrest. Police said the potential charges against Kim include attempted murder, assaulting a foreign envoy, obstruction, and violating a controversial law that bans praise or assistance for North Korea.

Police are also looking into Kim’s past travels to North Korea — seven times between 1999 and 2007 — during a previous era of inter-Korean cooperation, when South Korea was led by a liberal government.

Kim, who has a long history of anti-US and violent protests, said he acted alone in the attack on Mr Lippert. He told police he was protesting annual US-South Korean military drills that started on Monday — exercises that the North has long maintained are preparations for an invasion. Kim said the drills, which Seoul and Washington say are purely defensive, ruined efforts for reconciliation between the Koreas, according to police officials.

Security for Mr Lippert was another focus.

US ambassadors have security details, but their size largely depends on the threat level of the post. It’s not clear how many guards Mr Lippert had at the downtown venue where he was attacked, but since Seoul is seen as fairly safe, the number of guards would have been fewer than for American ambassadors in most of the Middle East.

The US Embassy, citing security reasons, only informed South Korean police of what Mr Lippert was doing a little before yesterday’s event, and it provided its own security detail for the ambassador, according to a Seoul police officer who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing office rules. The US Embassy directed all questions on security issues to US officials in Washington.

By law, South Korea provides police protection for a US ambassador only when the American Embassy requests it, according to South Korean police. The US Embassy didn’t request security for Mr Lippert, but 29 officers were deployed as a precaution, although all but four were on standby outside the building, the officer said.

Even before the attack on Mr Lippert, Kim was well-known among police and activists as one of a hard-core group of protesters willing to use violence to highlight their causes. He received a three-year suspended sentence in 2010 for throwing a piece of concrete at the Japanese ambassador to Seoul while protesting Japan’s claim to small disputed islands that are occupied by South Korea.

More recently, Kim had been under investigation by Seoul prosecutors after allegedly assaulting at least one public employee at an outdoor pop concert in January.

Officials at Seoul’s Jongno police station said they were aware of Kim’s violent history, but did not consider the possibility that he would show up at the breakfast meeting, despite his ties to the group that hosted it.

When Kim entered the hall where the attack occurred, a police officer asked one of the event organisers whether he should be allowed to enter, Jongno district police Chief Yun Myung-sung told reporters. The organising official answered that Kim could enter because he was associated with an organisation that had been invited to the meeting.

A security expert called the police inept.

“There is no excuse for allowing a blacklisted person to enter the venue for an event like this,” said Dr Yu Hyung-chang, a professor at Kyungnam University in Changwon who served in South Korea’s presidential secret service for 20 years until 2000. “If you are going to let him enter, then the very basic thing to do is to have an officer stay close to him at all times.”

Dr Yu said the police, knowing what they did about Kim, should have told the embassy about the danger and provided better security, especially since there has been a recent surge in anti-US demonstrations.

While most South Koreans look at the US presence favourably, America infuriates some leftists because of its role in Korea’s turbulent modern history.

Washington, which backed South Korea during the 1950-53 Korean War against the communist North, still stations 28,500 troops here, and anti-US activists see the annual military drills with Seoul as a major obstacle to their goal of a unified Korea.

“South and North Korea should be reunified,” Kim shouted as he slashed Lippert with a 25cm knife, police and witnesses said.

Mr Lippert became ambassador last October, and is a popular figure. He’s regularly seen walking his basset hound, Grigsby, near his residence, not far from where the attack happened. His wife gave birth here and the couple gave their son a Korean middle name. AP

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.