Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Is it sexist to talk about UK PM Theresa May’s shoes?

LONDON — For Margaret Thatcher, it was handbags. For Mrs Theresa May, it is shoes.

A close up of UK Prime Minister Theresa May's leopard print kitten heels and German Chancellor Angela Merkel's wedged pumps. Photo: AP

A close up of UK Prime Minister Theresa May's leopard print kitten heels and German Chancellor Angela Merkel's wedged pumps. Photo: AP

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

LONDON — For Margaret Thatcher, it was handbags. For Mrs Theresa May, it is shoes.

The new British prime minister likes to wear boldly patterned kitten heels, and the media is fascinated. Mrs May’s footwear has been analysed, photographed and satirised. Photojournalists have captured her shoes in close-up alongside the stilettos of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and the wedge heels of German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The Sun tabloid greeted Mrs May’s victory in Britain’s Conservative leadership race with a front-page image of her leopard-print shoes and the headline “Heel, boys”.

Dozens of countries around the world have had women at the helm, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Argentina, Norway, Denmark, Liberia and Canada. But female leaders are still scrutinised as much for style as for substance, and invariably compared to one another — a sign they are considered exceptions, rather than the rule.

“It’s easy to laugh off, but it trivialises the women,” said Ms Jessica Smith, a doctoral researcher at Birkbeck, University of London who studies gender and political leadership.

Ms Smith pointed out that Mrs May’s meeting with Ms Sturgeon after Britain’s European Union referendum came at “a crisis point for Scottish-English relations, an incredibly important point, and if we just talk about what shoes the women are wearing, that sort of undermines any sort of message”.

Mrs May is hardly the only female politician to draw comment for her outfits — think of Mrs Hillary Clinton’s previous fondness for trouser suits or Ms Merkel’s array of brightly coloured blazers.

And, in Britain, sooner or later the comparisons get around to Thatcher.

Britain’s first female leader stamped her imprint on the country with her free-market policies, and played a global role in the final years of the Cold War. Britain’s Conservatives remain in her thrall, 26 years after she left office and three years after her death.

Mrs May — the UK’s second female prime minister — draws endless Thatcher comparisons. In newspapers, she’s “the new Maggie”, “Maggie II” and “Maggie May”. The Times of London said Mrs May’s first appearance at prime minister’s question time was “pure, vintage Maggie”. Its editorial cartoon showed Mrs May clobbering opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn with a Thatcher-esque black handbag.

The Thatcher effect is not limited to the UK Both Ms Merkel and US Democrat presidential contender Mrs Clinton have been called an “Iron Lady”, Thatcher’s nickname.

Ms Lynne Featherstone, a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords, thinks the comparisons are understandable, because “women who make it to the top have similar qualities”.

“To be a woman in politics... you tend to have to be better than average,” she said. “You don’t get there because you were at school with some bloke. The same network isn’t there that’s always helped men throughout history. So the women who make it into politics and then go up are generally pretty formidable. And those who make it to the very top are a phenomenal force.”

The ascent of forceful politicians like Ms Merkel and Mrs May shows women can sometimes smash the glass ceiling to a country’s highest office. Once there, though, some think they still face a double standard.

Many feminists saw sexism at work in the debate over comments by Conservative lawmaker Andrea Leadsom, Mrs May’s rival for the party leadership, who suggested that being a mother made her a better leader than the childless Mrs May because it “means you have a very real stake in the future of our country”.

Male politicians’ parental status has rarely been an issue in election campaigns.

Others wince at the endless fascination with female politicians’ appearance.

The Sun’s fashion editor opined on Mrs May’s first day in office that the prime minister looked “approachable, not stuffy” in a collarless Amanda Wakeley coat, “quirky” shoes and “edgy chain necklace”.

Her predecessor Mr David Cameron’s blue suits and black brogues did not get the same treatment.

The Metro newspaper made the point neatly by reversing the tables, describing the prime minister’s husband in the sort of language often applied to first ladies: “Stepping into the limelight as First Man, Philip May showcased a sexy navy suit with a flourish of pinstripe.”

Mrs May recently told the Daily Telegraph newspaper that “I have grown used to the focus on my clothes and my shoes.” She said she likes to dress soberly and “add a little bit of interest with footwear”.

Dr Rosie Campbell, a Birkbeck professor who studies gender and politics, said Mrs May is one of a number of female politicians who have used their clothing cleverly, to send subtle signals of authority.

Thatcher became so associated with her no-nonsense handbags that it spawned a verb — to be “handbagged’” is to be berated forcefully.

“We always think it’s a bit negative when women’s clothes are scrutinised — and mostly it can be,” Dr Campbell said. “But I also think women use their dress — think about (former US Secretary of State) Madeleine Albright and all her different brooches. Sometimes it can be a way of sending political messages.”

She noted that Mrs May wore bold, leopard-patterned shoes when she entered 10 Downing St. for the first time. “Did she put those on thinking that she was signalling something: I mean business?”

Unlike Thatcher, who once said “I owe nothing to women’s lib” and had few women in her government, Mrs May has been photographed in a “This is what a feminist looks like” T-shirt, and has worked hard to increase the number of women in the Conservative Party. She appointed women to senior roles in her Cabinet, including the home secretary, in charge of borders and security.

Women make up about 30 per cent of Britain’s House of Commons, and about 20 per cent of the US Senate and House of Representatives. Some feminist campaigners say the focus on appearance will only change when there are as many women as men at all levels of politics.

“It is about numbers,” said Ms Frances Saunders, founder of 50:50 Parliament, a group that seeks a better gender balance in British politics. “The more women we have in there, the less noticeable it would be. I think we’d all get rather bored commenting on their clothes.” AP

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.