Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Time to change our toxic ties with climate-changing plastic

We’re all too aware of the consequences of plastics in the oceans and on land. However, beyond the visible pollution of our once pristine habitats, plastics are having a grave impact on the climate too.

Plastic waste piled outside an illegal recycling factory in Jenjarom, Kuala Langat, Malaysia. The author says that while a life without plastics may seem unimaginable, its worth remembering that their prevalence is a relativity recent phenomenon.

Plastic waste piled outside an illegal recycling factory in Jenjarom, Kuala Langat, Malaysia. The author says that while a life without plastics may seem unimaginable, its worth remembering that their prevalence is a relativity recent phenomenon.

Follow us on TikTok and Instagram, and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

We’re all too aware of the consequences of plastics in the oceans and on land. However, beyond the visible pollution of our once pristine habitats, plastics are having a grave impact on the climate too.

New research by the University of California, Santa Barbara, published in Nature calculates that across their lifecycle, plastics account for 3.8 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

That’s almost double the emissions of the aviation sector. If it were a country, the “Plastic Kingdom” would be the fifth-highest emitter in the world.

Demand is set to rise, too. At 380 million tonnes a year, we produce 190 times more plastic than we did in 1950.

If the demand for plastic continues to grow at its current rate of 4 per cent a year, emissions from plastic production will reach 15 per cent of global emissions by 2050.

More than 99 per cent of plastics are manufactured from petrochemicals, most commonly from petroleum and natural gas.

These raw materials are refined to form ethylene, propylene, butene, and other basic plastic building blocks, before being transported to manufacturers. The production and transport of these resins requires an awful lot of energy — and therefore fuel.

Greenhouse gas emissions also occur during the refining process itself — the “cracking” of larger hydrocarbons from petrochemicals into smaller ones suitable for making plastic releases carbon dioxide and methane.

According to the study, about 61 per cent of total plastic greenhouse gas emissions comes from the resin production and transport stage. A further 30 per cent is emitted at the product manufacturing stage.

The vast majority of these emissions come from the energy required to power the plants that turn raw plastic materials into the bottles, bin bags and bicycle helmets we use today.

The remainder occurs as a result of chemical and manufacturing processes — for example, the production of plastic foams uses hydrofluorocarbons, particularly potent greenhouse gases.

READ ALSO:

Toxic bacteria found on small pieces of plastic trash from S'pore beaches

The remaining carbon footprint occurs when plastics are thrown away. Incineration releases all of the stored carbon in the plastic into the atmosphere, as well as air pollutants such as dioxins, furans, mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls, which are toxic and damaging to human health.

As plastics take centuries to degrade, disposal in landfill makes only a small contribution to emissions in theory. However, as much as 40 per cent of landfill waste is burnt in open skies, dramatically speeding up the release of otherwise locked-up carbon.

MAKING PLASTIC CLIMATE-FRIENDLY

If we are to combat climate breakdown, reductions in plastic emissions are clearly needed.

Thankfully, the solution with the biggest potential is already in motion, albeit slowly. In showing that transitioning to a zero carbon energy system has the potential to reduce emissions from plastic by 51 per cent, the study provides yet another reason to rapidly phase out fossil fuels.

However, beyond urgently required global decarbonisation, we need to reduce our seemingly insatiable demand for carbon-based plastic. Increasing recycling rates is one simple way of doing this.

The highest-quality plastics can be recycled many times, and nearly all plastic can be recycled to some extent — but only 18 per cent was actually recycled worldwide in 2015.

Although each recycle process requires a small amount of new plastic, we can greatly increase the life cycle of the material by efficiently reusing what we make.

A more fundamental solution is to switch to making plastics from biodegradable sources such as wood, corn starch, and sugar cane. The materials themselves are carbon neutral, although renewable power is essential to eliminate the climate impact of energy costs during production, transport and waste processing.

However, a massive ramping up in the production of bioplastics — which currently make up less than 1 per cent of total plastic production — would require vast swathes of agricultural land.

READ ALSO:

The Big Read: As countries wage war on plastics, the jury's still out on how best to tackle the problem

With the global population set to rise dramatically, increasingly coveted arable space may not be able to satisfy demand.

The bottom line, therefore, is that we will need to reduce our demand for plastic. According to the study, simply reducing the annual growth in plastics demand from 4 per cent to 2 per cent could result in 60 per cent lower emissions from the sector in 2050.

While a life without plastics may seem unimaginable, its worth remembering that their prevalence is a relativity recent phenomenon. The first artificial plastic, Bakelite, was developed in 1907, but it wasn’t until the 1950s that the age of plastic began.

If we show a genuine appetite to address plastic pollution, the world could change again just as quickly.

Governments, corporations, and individuals must make research into alternatives a priority, and support alternatives to needless plastic waste. Were most people to carry a reusable water bottle, for example, we could eliminate the need for the estimated 20,000 single-use bottles bought each second around the world.

Of course, any of these solutions alone will not be enough. As the recent study notes, only by combining reduction in demand, top-notch recycling, decarbonisation of energy, and large-scale adoption of bioplastics can we tackle plastic’s contribution to the climate crisis.

But if we manage to do all of this, then we can cut plastics emissions to just 7 per cent of current levels.

Plastics need not be completely demonised as environmental scourges. Affordable, durable, and versatile, they bring a raft of societal benefits, and will undoubtedly serve an important role where replacements are unable to be found.

But decades of unbridled use and a throw-away culture are having grave consequences that go far beyond the visible pollution of our land and water. It is essential that we drastically reduce our use of avoidable plastics, and eliminate the carbon footprint of the ones we need to use.

Our relationship with plastic may be toxic, but it doesn’t need to be forever. THE CONVERSATION

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Laurie Wright is a senior lecturer at the Warsash School of Maritime Science and Engineering, Solent University. This piece first appeared in The Conversation.

Related topics

Plastic climate change global warming recycling

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Popular

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.