Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

S Koreans fight against tuition tide

In the second instalment of a two-part special report, TODAY looks at South Korea’s efforts to regulate its multi-billion-dollar tuition industry. After a ban on tuition in 1980 failed spectacularly, the Korean government has adopted a more sophisticated approach: Since 2004, it has ordered schools to hold after-school classes and offer free online lessons, as well as imposed a 10pm curfew on the operating hours of tuition centres.

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

In the second instalment of a two-part special report, TODAY looks at South Korea’s efforts to regulate its multi-billion-dollar tuition industry. After a ban on tuition in 1980 failed spectacularly, the Korean government has adopted a more sophisticated approach: Since 2004, it has ordered schools to hold after-school classes and offer free online lessons, as well as imposed a 10pm curfew on the operating hours of tuition centres.

Apart from government efforts, individuals and organisations have also come forward to fight against the tuition craze and advocate for better education policies as a long-term solution. Slowly but surely, the tide is changing — and Singapore could take a leaf out of South Korea’s experience as it seeks to put a lid on the demand for tuition.

SEOUL — Fame, money and success, Mr Lee Bohm, 44, had it all when he was one of South Korea’s “star tutors” — or a “star gansa” as the locals call it. For five consecutive years, he was earning US$1 million (S$1.25 million) annually. At one point, he tutored as many as 300 pupils, while 10,000 watched his online lectures.

But the alumnus of the prestigious Seoul National University is now a leading advocate against a tuition craze that has reached its zenith.

Today, he travels around the country to advocate better education policies so parents need not send their children for tuition.

“Poorer families are losing out as rich families continue to pay for tuition services,” he said.

Urging the government to encourage entrepreneurship among the young as the country grapples with high youth unemployment, Mr Lee added: “The Korean economy of the future needs creative minds; it is not just about being able to find the right answers anymore.”

Mr Lee said he started giving tuition during his graduate-school days. It was an easy way to earn good money, he recounted.

Being able to tutor students on several subjects, he gradually made a name for himself — so much so that he abandoned his doctorate studies in 2000 and founded Megastudy, which has since become one of the largest private-tuition organisations in South Korea, to fulfil his wish of providing education for the masses.

However, only three years after setting up the company, he became disillusioned with the cut-throat industry when he found out that some of his colleagues were resorting to underhand tactics such as smearing their fellow tutors online and paying people to write glowing testimonies about themselves.

“I was so shocked... I thought (deeply) about what I was doing,” he said.

Like Mr Lee, there are others in South Korea who are fighting against the tuition tide. For example, a group of citizens had set up a non-profit organisation called World Without Worries of Private Education (WWWPE). Its Vice-President Jin An-Sang, a former high-school maths teacher, saw his former students who attended hagwon — Korean for private-learning institutes — lose the ability to think and learn independently.

Both Mr Lee and WWWPE believe the government should improve the education system, instead of introducing more regulations for the tuition sector. Mr Jin criticised the hagwon’s marketing strategy of promising to teach students lessons they have yet to learn in school as “outrageous (and) fomenting anxiety among parents and students”.

“This excessive tuition demand has caused stratification among students and schools. Everyone just wants to get ahead in the education race,” said Mr Jin, who called for teachers to be trained in innovative ways in teaching maths — the second most popular subject after the English language that students seek tuition for.

GOVERNMENT MEASURES

Before the government rolled out a 10pm curfew on the operating hours of hagwon in 2008, tuition classes would continue late into the night, said hagwon-policy officer Hwang Sun Wook of the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. “Exhausted students will not be able to focus in school if they stay too long in hagwon … we have to (maintain a) balance between private and public education,” he said.

Currently, to ensure tuition centres abide by the curfew, officers conduct patrols twice a week and carry out surprise raids on the centres after 10pm. The authorities also offer monetary incentives for citizens to tip them off on errant centres.

Representatives from the Gangnam and Northern District education offices told TODAY that, over the years, tuition centres have become increasingly compliant to the rules. The number of cases in which the curfew was broken fell from 450 in 2010 to 235 last year.

Nevertheless, some hagwon still break the rules when exams are approaching. For instance, these centres would pull down the shutters while continuing to conduct lessons after 10pm. When caught, they would claim they were unaware of the rules.

Apart from the curfew, the government has introduced other regulations, such as getting hagwon to justify their fees based on their annual financial statements and allowing them to hire only tutors who have at least a two-year college degree.

To dampen the demand for tuition, the government introduced free online learning for students in 2004, with thousands of lectures made available. Public-school teachers or popular tutors would also give lessons on subjects such as English and maths on the country’s free-to-air education TV channel.

That same year, public schools started offering after-school classes at a fraction of hagwon fees. Now, almost all elementary and middle schools in Korea conduct such classes. The participation rate among students has inched up over the years, reaching about 58 per cent last year.

Since 2004, the Korean Ministry of Education has spent about 300 billion won (S$350 million) on online learning. For this year, about 240 billion won has been budgeted for after-school classes.

A ministry spokesperson told TODAY that the government is planning to draw up laws to ban hagwon from teaching students ahead of the public school curriculum.

In Singapore, some Members of Parliament have called for a study on the impact of tuition. Since 2007, South Korea’s Ministry of Education has conducted annual surveys on private-education spending by parents and students and their perceptions of tuition. The findings have helped to craft education policies to reduce private-education spending, its spokesperson said.

HAGWON FEELING THE HEAT

Slowly but surely, hagwon are feeling the tightening noose. “We are given a licence but they want to stop us from running the business, it is ridiculous,” said Mr Cho Moon-ho, who represents the Korean Federation of Hagwons.

Hagwon owners interviewed said that the government’s regulations are challenging business operations. Compliance costs are adding up, enrolment is falling and profits have been cut since the curfew was put in place, they said.

The government’s political messages to the public on hagwon — blaming tuition for the low birth rate and high household spending, for instance — are also giving the tuition industry a bad reputation, said New Study Academy hagwon owner Kim Sung Oh. He added: “Students do not have time to come to my centre after their long after-school sessions. Fee restrictions also limit the quality I can provide.”

According to official statistics, the number of tuition centres in Seoul has fallen in the last few years by between 200 and 300 annually, stabilising at the current figure of about 13,500.

Average monthly spending per student on private education dropped by 1.7 per cent to 236,000 won last year, compared to 2011. Over the same period, the participation rate for hagwon fell by 2.3 percentage points to 69.4 per cent.

While noting that the government’s efforts have made some inroads to shrink the tuition industry, Mr Hwang from the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education said the bleak economy and low birth rate also accounted for the declining figures. “Parents still have to change their mindset that hagwon are the cure-all,” he said.

A CAUTIONARY TALE

The tuition craze has raised concerns among South Koreans about social mobility. Public data have shown that richer households are significantly outspending the less affluent families on tuition. For households earning more than 7 million won, the average monthly spending per student on tuition was 426,000 won last year. In comparison, spending by households earning less than 1 million won was 68,000 won.

However, observers felt that there is a limit to government intervention. The key is for the authorities to invest more in schools and raise public trust of the country’s education system.

Seoul National University Professor Moon Hwy Chang noted that Japan and Taiwan have large tuition industries. However, their governments have refrained from intervening, as “it is not so effective”, he said.

Nevertheless, Professor Okhwa Lee of Chungbuk National University acknowledged the government’s efforts, adding that offering online lessons and after-school classes was a “good start”.

On whether the government could have stepped in earlier, the South Korean Ministry of Education spokesperson noted that it tried to ban private tuition in 1980 but it resulted in rampant illegal tutoring. “It is difficult to curb private education since it is related to individuals’ right to learning,” she said.

Prof Moon argued that Singapore could learn from South’s Korea experience by refraining from regulating the tuition sector. Budget constraints and bureaucratic processes, among other things, will limit the impact, he added. He also cautioned against treating tuition as competition to the public-school system. “The (Singapore and South Korean) governments should be careful not to limit the potential benefit and availability for people that are derived from the diversity in the education sector,” he added.

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.