Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Singapore soars up innovation rankings, US falls out of top 10

SINGAPORE ― Singapore jumped ahead of European economies Germany, Switzerland, and Finland into third place in the 2018 Bloomberg Innovation Index, while the US dropped out of the top 10 for the first time in the six years the gauge has been compiled. South Korea and Sweden retained their No. 1 and No. 2 rankings.

Singapore jumped into third place on the strength of its top ranking in the tertiary-efficiency category. TODAY file photo

Singapore jumped into third place on the strength of its top ranking in the tertiary-efficiency category. TODAY file photo

SINGAPORE ― Score another one for Singapore, while Silicon Valley slides.

Singapore jumped ahead of European economies Germany, Switzerland, and Finland into third place in the 2018 Bloomberg Innovation Index on the strength of its top ranking in the tertiary-efficiency category. The US dropped out of the top 10 for the first time in the six years the gauge has been compiled. South Korea and Sweden retained their No. 1 and No. 2 rankings.

The index scores countries using seven criteria, including research and development spending and concentration of high-tech public companies.

The US fell to 11th place from ninth mainly because of an eight-spot slump in the post-secondary, or tertiary, education-efficiency category, which includes the share of new science and engineering graduates in the labour force.

Value-added manufacturing also declined. Improvement in the productivity score could not make up for the lost ground.

“I see no evidence to suggest that this trend will not continue,” said Mr Robert Atkinson, president of the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation in Washington, DC.

“Other nations have responded with smart, well-funded innovation policies like better R&D tax incentives, more government funding for research, more funding for technology commercialization initiatives.”

“Singapore has always placed strong focus on educating her populace, especially in STEM disciplines,” said Professor Yeo Kiat Seng, professor and associate provost at the Singapore University of Technology and Design, referring to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. It also has a “steadfast commitment to funding R&D and innovation,” added Prof Yeo, who holds 38 patents. 

Supplier ecosystem 

South Korea remained the global-innovation gold medalist for the fifth-consecutive year Samsung Electronics, the nation’s most-valuable company by market capitalisation, has received more US patents in the 2000s than any firm except International Business Machines.

And its semiconductors, smartphones and digital-media equipment spawned an ecosystem of Korean suppliers and partners similar to what Japan developed around Sony and Toyota Motor.

China moved up two spots to 19th, buoyed by its high proportion of new science and engineering graduates in the labour force and increasing number of patents by innovators such as Huawei Technologies.

“One common trait of the US, Korea and China is that people accept failure as part of the process,” said Mr Prinn Panitchpakdi, country head of CLSA Thailand, an Asian brokerage and investment group.

“Innovation lags in countries where the culture emphasizes risk avoidance and where R&D is seen purely an expense, not an investment. That’s the mindset in Thailand.”

It dropped one spot from a year earlier, to 45th.

Top-tier countries 

Japan, one of three Asian nations in the top 10, rose one slot to No. 6. France moved up to ninth from 11th, joining five other European economies in the top tier.

Israel rounded out this group and was the only country to beat South Korea in the R&D category.

South Africa and Iran moved back into the top 50; the last time both were included was 2014. Turkey was one of the biggest gainers, jumping four spots to 33rd because of improvements in tertiary efficiency, productivity and two other categories.

The biggest losers were New Zealand and Ukraine, which each dropped four places. The productivity measure influenced New Zealand’s shift, while Ukraine was hurt by a lower tertiary-efficiency ranking.

Movements in this year’s list were generally less dramatic than last year, when Russia took a 14-spot tumble following sanctions related to Ukraine and the plunge in energy prices. In the current index, it moved up one spot to 25th.

The 2018 ranking process began with more than 200 economies. Each was scored on a zero to 100 scale based on seven equally weighted categories.

Nations that didn’t report data for at least six categories were eliminated, trimming the list to 80. Bloomberg released the top 50 and category scores within this cohort. BLOOMBERG

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.