Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Trump gave Kim a summit, but left with little to show for it

SINGAPORE — Donald Trump’s historic summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was unquestionably a success — for Kim.

US President Donald Trump at the press conference at Capella Singapore after the Trump-Kim summit on June 12.

US President Donald Trump at the press conference at Capella Singapore after the Trump-Kim summit on June 12.

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

SINGAPORE — Donald Trump’s historic summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was unquestionably a success — for Kim.

By credibly threatening the United States with nuclear war, he won a one-on-one meeting with the American president — a longtime strategic goal of his family’s regime. And that’s not all.

Mr Trump tossed in a suspension of military exercises with South Korea, while China suggested revisiting economic sanctions that the White House credits for the summit. Meanwhile, the president showered Kim with praise, calling the dictator who leads one of the planet’s most oppressive and brutal regimes “smart” and “very talented,” declaring the meeting “a great honour” and saying he trusts Kim.

Less clear is what the US got in return. American officials said before the meeting they would insist that Kim agree to the “complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement” of his nuclear weapons arsenal. The phrase appears nowhere in Mr Trump and Mr Kim’s statement.

Also missing: basics such as a timetable for Mr Kim to give up his weapons, verification procedures, or even a mutual definition of denuclearisation.

‘GAVE UP NOTHING’

The president described the summit as a starting point, and the US concessions as innocuous. “I gave up nothing,” he told reporters at a news conference, and then read off a list of what he believes were North Korean concessions — a halt to missile and nuclear tests, the earlier release of three American hostages and a promise to return remains of US soldiers dating to the Korean War.

Still, some Korea watchers said that it was better for the US and North Korea to be talking than threatening each other, even without a host of specific commitments from Kim.

“I would rate the summit a 10 because it achieved a first-ever diplomatic encounter between two long-time adversaries,” said MrPatrick Cronin, director of the Center for a New American Security’s Asia-Pacific security programme.

“They signed a broad political understanding while leaving the details for expert negotiations to follow.”

Mr Trump’s political supporters back home may well agree. Seventy per cent of Americans supported Mr Trump meeting withMr Kim, according to a poll by Real Clear Politics and the Charles Koch Institute, even though just 31 percent think he’ll succeed at persuading North Korea to give up its weapons.

But so far, Mr Trump hasn’t shown he’ll avoid the same trap he’s accused his predecessors of falling into: giving North Korea too much without getting anything in return. While the president repeatedly described the document he and Mr Kim signed as “comprehensive,” at 426 words it is anything but — and there is no indication of when or how Mr Kim will follow through on any of his promises.

“I think he will start that process right away,” said Mr Trump.

KIM’S SUMMIT

Ms Beatrice Fihn, executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, criticised the document as “unsubstantial” and said Mr Trump and Mr Kim instead should have signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

Mr Michael McFaul, who served as President Barack Obama’s ambassador to Russia, said on Twitter after the document was released that the US “gave up a lot for nothing” with the summit and got “much, much less than a binding deal.”

For all of what he achieved at the summit, Mr Kim’s path ahead isn’t all simple. Mr Trump made clear he was keeping US sanctions in place until he saw evidence of a reduced nuclear threat. Mr Kim won only a vague "security guarantee" from Mr Trump and no mention of a treaty to formally end the hostilities between the two nations.

But the summit did have all of the trappings Mr Kim could have desired. He and Mr Trump met on a red carpet in front of a backdrop of equal numbers of US and North Korean flags at the Capella hotel, a luxury resort on Sentosa Island. They greeted each other with a 13-second handshake, then retired for a 38-minute private meeting before being joined by aides.

There were multiple photo ops, including a walk through the hotel’s garden, more hand shakes, pats on the back and finally the signing ceremony, complete with a pen bearing Mr Trump’s signature that Mr Kim did not appear to use.

Before the meeting, Mr Kim was cheered by Singaporeans as he drove from the airport and then during an outing Monday evening.

Through a translator, North Korea’s leader summed up the surreal nature of the meeting, telling the US president that those watching around the world might see it as “a science fiction movie.”

DIFFERENT APPROACH

Mr Anthony Ruggiero, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington and a former official of the US State and Treasury departments which investigated the illicit financing of North Korea, said Mr Trump’s meeting with Mr Kim appeared heavy on pomp and light on substance.

“The handshake is historic but the optics likely hide a significant gap in the substance,’’ he said in an interview as the meeting took place. “It’s important for President Trump not to fall into the North Korean trap as it is –which is three generations of Kims have really persuaded American presidents that they’re ready to denuclearise by just simply making promises and not delivering on those promises.”

Former South Korean Foreign Minister Yoon Young Kwan said Mr Trump’s negotiation appears “very different” from past talks between the two countries because it’s the first time a sitting US president has taken a primarily political approach to the issue.

“So far US administrations tended to focus on a narrowly defined military-security deal instead of trying to tackle the root cause of North Korea problem, which is a high level of mutual distrust,” he said on Bloomberg Television. “North Korea is a small and weak country surrounded by big powers, and that has made North Koreans paranoid about their own national security.”

“We needed to alleviate this kind of paranoia of North Korea on their own national security,” he said.

Mr Trump himself admitted that it might not work.

“I think he’s going to do these things,” the president said. “I may be wrong. I may be standing in front of you in six months and say, ‘I was wrong.’ I don’t know if I’ll ever admit that, but I’ll find some kind of excuse.” BLOOMBERG

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.