Car loan limits may hurt the people they are meant to protect
In introducing the new car loan restrictions, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) had explained that the measures were necessary to encourage financial prudence among buyers and prevent buyers from over-extending themselves (“New limits on car loans”, Feb 26).
In introducing the new car loan restrictions, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) had explained that the measures were necessary to encourage financial prudence among buyers and prevent buyers from over-extending themselves (“New limits on car loans”, Feb 26).
While it remains to be seen how the market will react to the new realities, I am concerned that the policy may in fact have the reverse effect on some segments of Singaporeans.
On one hand, impulsive young buyers who still perceive car ownership as a social status symbol will be tempted to throw all their cash savings into a car purchase.
For these buyers, instead of encouraging financial prudence, the measures have the opposite effect.
Meanwhile, families who need a car to transport their elderly dependents or their young children on a daily basis may be left with no other choice but to sacrifice their hard-earned savings for the down payment on a car.
Unless there are other viable alternatives that offer the same point-to-point convenience as a personal vehicle, there will always be many such Singaporeans who find it difficult to imagine life without a car.
In their case, it is not “financial imprudence” that is the problem; their seemingly irrational decision is being forced upon them by a situation that they have no control over.
I hope the Government will review its policy and adjust the restrictions over time so that the measures introduced will not hurt the very people it seeks to protect.
