Skip to main content



Sign of trouble in Indonesian courts: Rulings that defy facts

JAKARTA — Indonesia’s troubled legal system is again coming under scrutiny, after rulings in two high-profile cases that have alarmed both Western expatriates and local organisations that fight corruption in the country’s judiciary.

JAKARTA — Indonesia’s troubled legal system is again coming under scrutiny, after rulings in two high-profile cases that have alarmed both Western expatriates and local organisations that fight corruption in the country’s judiciary.

One involves a Canadian educator serving an 11-year term in a high-security prison on charges of sexually assaulting kindergartners at one of the country’s most prestigious international schools – a case the school and the man’s lawyers contend was fabricated.

The other is that of a powerful Indonesian politician who avoided prosecution in a corruption scandal, much to the chagrin of investigators in one of Asia’s most graft-ridden nations.

The two men have never met, but their legal cases crossed paths on the same day last month, with the outcomes highlighting a system in which rulings often appear to hinge more on incompetence, bribery or public opinion than on facts, according to legal analysts.

“I think the two cases make a strong message that Indonesia still needs reform in the justice system,” said Ms Bivitri Susanti, head of the Jakarta chapter of Indonesia’s Association of Constitutional Law Lecturers. “The reforms must include a legal education system that can produce good, quality law enforcers.”

Late last month, the Indonesian Supreme Court announced that it had rejected an appeal by the Canadian, Neil Bantleman, an administrator at the Jakarta Intercultural School, who along with an Indonesian teaching assistant was convicted in 2015 on charges of sexually assaulting children the year before.

The school, whose students come from more than 60 countries and include the children of Western diplomats and wealthy Indonesians, insists that no children were ever sexually assaulted. That assertion has been backed by the governments of Canada, Britain and the United States, which have repeatedly expressed grave concerns about the competence shown in the legal proceedings. (Bantleman also holds British citizenship and the school was founded by Americans decades ago.)

The same day that appeal was rejected, a district court judge in Jakarta cleared Mr Setya Novanto, speaker of the Indonesian House of Representatives, as a suspect in the embezzlement of as much as US$180 million (S$245 million) from a national identity card programme, which is being investigated by the country’s independent Corruption Eradication Commission.

In a pre-trial hearing, the judge ruled that evidence and testimony against Mr Setya were inadmissible. The anti-corruption agency, popularly known by its Indonesian initials, KPK, had gathered the material during the investigations and trials of two government officials.

The two rulings jolted both Westerners and local organisations.

“We have been following the school’s case closely since it began, and its impact has been deeply felt by the foreign business community as a symbol of legal risk in Indonesia,” said Mr A. Lin Neumann, managing director of the US Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia.

“Foreign investors are concerned about the message this sends,” he said. “Quite frankly, the expatriate community had hoped for a better outcome for the teachers and staff caught up in this case.”

Mr Setya cut his political teeth in the Golkar Party of Suharto, the autocratic president, who by one estimate stole up to US$35 billion during his 32-year rule before being toppled by pro-democracy demonstrations in 1998.

Currently Golkar’s chairman, Mr Setya has been accused but never prosecuted in several corruption scandals. In one notable case in 2015, he was forced to resign as House speaker after an audiotape surfaced that purported to show him trying to extort billions of dollars in shares from the Indonesian unit of American mining giant Freeport-McMoRan. He was reinstated as speaker the next year.

In recent weeks, he failed to appear at the anti-corruption agency for questioning in the identity card scandal – an appearance that could have led to his detention. Instead, he was said to have been admitted to a hospital with symptoms of vertigo after playing ping pong and then kept for treatment of heart and liver ailments.

Photos of Mr Setya lying in a hospital bed with breathing tubes were circulated on social media and panned as being faked.

Mr Setya’s defence team did not reply to phone calls and text messages regarding his medical condition or legal status.

Anti-corruption investigators have told reporters that they are considering naming Mr Setya a suspect again after compiling additional evidence.

Mr Setya and his party are part of President Joko Widodo’s government, which could create further complications for the anti-corruption agency. Its investigators are already embroiled in long-running disputes with the House of Representatives and the National Police because of past prosecutions.

“It’s unjust, and that’s our challenge for the past 20 years and for the next 20 years,” said Mr Erry Riyana Hardjapamekas, a former deputy chairman of the anti-corruption agency. “The knowledge of the judges and the legal system itself – at the end of the day, it’s, ‘Let’s talk about money, let’s talk about influence, let’s talk about politics.’”

Bantleman’s legal options are exhausted unless he applies for clemency from Mr Widodo. But to do so he would have to admit guilt, and he has maintained his innocence. THE NEW YORK TIMES

Read more of the latest in




Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.