That the Government prefers the “moral suasion” approach when it comes to tackling workplace discrimination and shaping employers’ mindsets comes as no surprise — this is in line with the perception that the Government does not want to “burden” businesses with too much legislation as they are creating jobs for Singaporeans, else they may pack up and go to a neighbouring country.

While this may be applicable in the early days of the country’s development, times have changed.

Work practices evolve over time. With progress in technology, education levels and training, the employees of today are very different from those in the past. This well-educated and forward-thinking workforce expects more in terms of progression, fairness and justice.

The influx of foreign talent and multinational corporations into Singapore has brought with it different work cultures, practices and mindsets. It is great if these practices are fair and to the benefit of both employees and employers. Consequently, Singapore would benefit through this win-win situation.

However, assuming such perfect scenarios would be the norm is wishful thinking.

Leaving the issue of work-related discrimination to the Tripartite Alliance for Fair Employment Practice (TAFEP), which relies on moral suasion instead of legislation, is kicking the proverbial can down the road.

Companies are guided by the Companies Act. Likewise, basic legislation against work-related discrimination will guide employers and business owners. In fact, the current legislation to safeguard employees’ interests is lacking and losing relevance and it is timely that the Ministry of Manpower is reviewing the Employment Act.

Expecting any legislation to be a silver bullet is not being realistic, but without change, it would just be more of the same. In a fast-paced and dynamic environment, this could even lead to regression.

So let us embrace change like our first generation of leaders did, and accept that it is required to progress.