Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Parliament passes Bill to prescribe list of non-taxable government fees after wrong GST charges

SINGAPORE — The Government will prescribe a list of regulatory fees where the Goods and Services Tax (GST) should not be charged after Parliament passed a Bill on Tuesday (April 2).

Parliament passes Bill to prescribe list of non-taxable government fees after wrong GST charges
Follow TODAY on WhatsApp
New: You can now listen to articles.
Sorry, the audio is unavailable right now. Please try again later.

This audio is AI-generated.

SINGAPORE — The Government will prescribe a list of regulatory fees where the Goods and Services Tax (GST) should not be charged after Parliament passed a Bill on Tuesday (April 2).

The GST (Amendment) Bill will provide greater clarity on the tax treatment for government fees and address the issue of GST being wrongly levied on 18 fees paid to six government agencies, said Transport Minister and Second Minister for Finance Chee Hong Tat as he tabled the Bill for a second reading.

The erroneous GST charges were first made known in February by the Ministry of Finance (MOF) following an internal review. The Government has said it will make at least S$7.5 million in refunds to affected individuals and businesses.

GST is generally levied on government services. These include, for example, fees for the use of public sports facilities or the rental of hawker stalls.

Doing so ensures parity in tax treatment where services that can potentially be provided by or outsourced to the private or non-government sector are subject to GST, said Mr Chee.

However, GST should not be charged for services that are regulatory in nature, or done for the purposes of control and regulation.

The 18 fees that were found to have been wrongly taxed comprised application fees for professional licences like a real estate agent licence, registering a Lasting Power of Attorney and administrative fees for renting out public flats. As most of them are for the processing of applications, rather than licence fees, agencies had wrongly deemed them to be taxable, authorities had said previously.

At the moment, government agencies get to assess and determine what constitutes a regulatory fee, based on guidance provided through government circulars. But agencies “may not always be clear where to draw the line”, said Mr Chee.

“This is not ideal and can give rise to wrongful charging of GST, as was the case for the 18 fees.”

WHAT WILL BE DONE

With the Bill, the Government will prescribe a list of non-taxable government fees, such as those paid for applications of professional licences and licence renewal fees.

The list will also include the 18 regulatory fees that are being refunded.

In line with the change in legislative approach, the MOF and the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore will work closely with agencies to assess their fees, instead of allowing self-assessment by the agencies.

Mr Chee said the initial list of non-taxable fees will be published in the Gazette in end-April when the Bill comes into force.

He added that the MOF had earlier reviewed all the regulatory and ancillary fees that currently charge GST and is now working with agencies to review the remaining “more than 1,700” fees that do not charge GST.

“MOF will continue to work with agencies to progressively prescribe their regulatory fees in the non-taxable list, and we aim to complete this by September,” Mr Chee told the House.

WHAT IS GST CHARGEABLE?

Mr Chee laid out the categories of government fees that will be subject to GST.

The first, which makes up the vast majority, comprises fees paid for services provided by the Government. Examples include the rental of public sports facilities, which are already levied with GST currently.

“There is no change in the treatment of these fees,” he said.

Another category includes fees that are not charged with GST now but should be taxed moving forward based on the Government’s “clarified policy intent”.

These include fees for examinations that individuals must take before being issued a licence, which some agencies are currently not charging GST. Other examples include inspection fees prior to the licensing and conduct of certain business operations.

Overall, it is estimated that there are “more than 100” of such examination and inspection-related fees.

Mr Chee said the Government will help to “minimise the impact” by absorbing the GST on these fees in the first instance and impose a freeze on these fees until end-2025.

MOF has also “separately asked the agencies involved to review their fees and charges, and to consider ways where they can streamline processes or reduce costs”.

“We will work closely with agencies on this to review if the above-mentioned fees may be reduced or even removed,” the minister said.

“If there are unavoidable cost increases, then agencies would have to raise their fees. But they will do so only after end-2025 and will ensure that any increases are phased in gradually, taking into consideration the impact on affected stakeholders.” CNA

For more reports like this, visit cna.asia.

Related topics

GST MOF Chee Hong Tat

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to our newsletter for the top features, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.