Pakatan ‘falling apart’, fuelling Singapore-Malaysia spats: Bilahari Kausikan
SINGAPORE — Political instability in the ruling Pakatan Harapan coalition and its failure to capture Malay support are aggravating relations between Malaysia and Singapore, said former diplomat Bilahari Kausikan.
Former diplomat Bilahari Kausikan said after Barisan Nasional was replaced by PH in the 14th general election last year, “old bilateral issues almost immediately resurfaced”.
SINGAPORE — Political instability in the ruling Pakatan Harapan (PH) coalition and its failure to capture Malay support are aggravating relations between Malaysia and Singapore, said former Singaporean diplomat Bilahari Kausikan.
Mr Kausikan said after Barisan Nasional (BN) was replaced by PH in the 14th general election last year, “old bilateral issues almost immediately resurfaced”.
He was referring to recent disputes on maritime boundaries and joint airspace control, as well as ongoing negotiations into the price of water Malaysia sells to Singapore.
“These issues are not new and they cannot be resolved,” Mr Kausikan said in a public lecture at the National University of Singapore.
“To resolve an issue, both sides must want to resolve it. Whereas in this case, the other side’s interest is to keep them alive to use them to rally support.
Read also
“It would be wrong to place too much emphasis on the personality of (Prime Minister) Dr Mahathir (Mohamad) although that was undoubtedly a factor,” he told more than 200 attendees.
“More importantly, the new Pakatan Harapan government is fundamentally incoherent.
“It’s falling apart,” said Mr Kausikan.
He cited a Merdeka Centre research last year which found a three-way split of Malay votes for PH, Umno and Islamist party PAS, meaning that the support of Malaysia’s largest ethnic group looks to be fiercely contested by the three groups.
The results, said Mr Kausikan, reveals the instability of the ruling pact, which will grow further as it desperately tries to rally greater Malay support if it hopes to retain power in the next general election.
Read also
“Using Singapore as a bogeyman or whipping boy to rally the Malay ground is a time-tested tactic,” he said.
“Dr Mahathir used it when he led Umno, he uses it now that he is head of Bersatu.
“This is not just a matter of personality or historical baggage.”
In his lecture, Mr Kausikan also said he expects Malaysia’s political scenario to remain in a flux for some time because of infighting within PH and the growing threat of Islamic fundamentalism.
SHOW OF MIGHT
The former policy adviser to Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged the republic’s incoming new leadership to maintain the country’s military capabilities, saying that a show of might is crucial in its dealings with Malaysia.
This is because Malaysian leaders will always seek to undermine and subjugate the city-state.
“Even though Singapore is now accepted as a sovereign state, it is not a situation which Malaysia is entirely comfortable with,” Mr Kausikan said at the lecture titled 'Singapore’s relations with Indonesia and Malaysia'.
Read also
“Today, the governments of our neighbours deal with Singapore as a sovereign nation only because we have developed capabilities that have given them no other choice.
“It is not their preferred way of dealing with a small, ethnic Chinese-majority city-state.
“They would prefer us to accept a subordinate role as do their own Chinese populations,” he said.
Singapore’s new leaders must, therefore, continue to “establish red lines” which send a clear message to Putrajaya that the country is equipped and ready to use its military might in the event it is forced to a corner.
“The threat of use of force is as much part of diplomacy as negotiations. Diplomacy is not just about being nice.
“It is essential to establish red lines because it is only when red lines are clearly understood that mutual relations can be conducted on the basis of mutual respect.”
Mr Kausikan said the fundamental reason for Malaysia’s continued provocative acts towards Singapore is because of the republic’s system of a multiracial meritocracy, which greatly contrasted from the former’s race-based policies.
“The basic and enduring issue is not what we do, but what we are – a multiracial, meritocratic small city state that performs better than they do and we must always perform better.
“The very existence of our dramatically very different system, too close to be ignored or disregarded, that does better than their system, poses an implicit criticism of their system to their own people.” THE MALAYSIAN INSIGHT
Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.
Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.
By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.
